What to publish
The order below is deliberate. Everything at the top has an answer only your practice can give; everything further down is contested by publishers who will keep winning it. Start where you are the only source.
The state access page
One per state you operate in, reviewed twice a yearThe constraint written as a page. It answers the question that delays a booking by a fortnight, the answer differs by state, and almost no competitor has published one.
Insurance and self-pay pricing
Once, verified quarterlyThe two questions that stop a booking at the last moment. Publishing a number wins the call from somebody who is still ringing round for one.
Clinician pages
One per clinician, updated as credentials changeReferrals go to people. A page per therapist gives a surgeon something to link to and a patient something to check before committing to eight weeks.
Specialism pages, per clinic
One per specialism per siteVestibular, pelvic health and hand therapy carry low volume, high intent and almost no competition, and a templated chain location page cannot compete for them.
Post-surgical protocol pages
One per procedure you rehabilitate regularlyA page a referring surgeon reads. Publishing the protocol you follow starts the referral conversation without a meeting, and it happens to serve patients too.
Condition pages with named review
Two a month once everything above existsWorth writing last and only for conditions you genuinely treat, because the generic version belongs to publishers. Yours wins by ending somewhere specific.
And what not to
- Exercise and stretch libraries, which are a video contest and attract people avoiding an appointment
- Generic condition articles competing head on with national health publishers
- Location pages that would describe a different clinic after one find and replace
- Free screening offers built as landing pages before anybody has checked who they reach
- Outcome claims stated without the measure, the population and the limits



