Skip to content
LinkedIn content

A LinkedIn content agency can write it. Not be you.

Everything that works here comes from something you saw, decided or got wrong. The writing is delegable. Having been in the room is not.

So this page starts with the part every competitor leaves out: roughly ninety minutes a week of yours, itemised below.

feed · same founder, same week

Written for them

Tuesday · 09:00

41 reactions

“Excited to share some thoughts on why alignment between sales and marketing is more important than ever in 2026. Here are 5 takeaways...”

Something only they could say

Thursday · 07:40

1,240 reactions

“We lost a £40k deal last month because I insisted on a feature nobody asked for. Here is the exact call where the customer told me and I did not listen.”

Illustrative. The second one cannot be written by somebody who was not in the room.

The shift

Nobody follows a logo. They follow a person who keeps being right.

Reach on this platform is attached to individuals, and has been for years. Most linkedin content services still sell a brand presence because it is easier to scope and does not require anybody senior to change how they spend Tuesday.

The consequence is that thought leadership from a company account is read as advertising and the same sentence from a named operator is read as a view. That is not a formatting problem, and no amount of budget moves it.

The ledger

Ninety minutes a week, itemised.

Any linkedin marketing agency can tell you what it will do. This is what you will have to do, which is the number that decides whether the channel works.

Deciding what you actually think about something

30 min

yours

The raw material. Nobody can invent your opinion for you.

Recording the story behind it

20 min

yours

A voice note on a walk is enough. It has to be your memory.

Turning that into drafted posts

0 min

ours

This is the part an agency is genuinely good at.

Approving or killing each draft

20 min

yours

It goes out under your name. You read it first, every time.

Replying to comments on your own posts

20 min

yours

The comments are where the deals start. This one is not negotiable.

Scheduling, formatting, analytics, repurposing

0 min

ours

Entirely ours, and it is more work than it looks.

Your total, every week~90 min

If that is not available, this is the wrong channel for you right now and I would rather say so than take the retainer and produce posts nobody believes.

Read this before you sign anything

What a LinkedIn content agency cannot promise you.

This category sells a fantasy more often than any other on the site: a serious personal presence that costs the founder nothing. A LinkedIn content agency can genuinely remove most of the work, and four things stay with you no matter who you hire.

  1. 01

    You cannot outsource having an opinion.

    Everything that works on this platform comes from something you saw, decided or got wrong. A writer can shape it, sharpen it and format it. They cannot have been in the meeting. A founder who supplies nothing gets bland posts with their face on, and the audience is unusually good at telling.

  2. 02

    Ninety minutes a week is the floor, not the pitch.

    Roughly half an hour deciding what you think, twenty minutes recording it, twenty approving drafts and twenty in the comments. Any provider promising a serious presence for zero founder time is describing a company page, and company pages do not work for this.

  3. 03

    It will feel uncomfortable for about six weeks.

    The posts that work are more specific and more exposed than most executives are used to being in public. The first genuinely candid one is difficult to press publish on. If you are not prepared to be occasionally wrong in front of your market, this channel will stay polite and stay flat.

  4. 04

    There is no algorithm to exploit, only a slow one to satisfy.

    Reach here is volatile week to week and largely outside anyone's control. Posting pods, engagement rings and comment farms produce numbers that do not convert and carry real account risk. What compounds is a named person being consistently worth reading, which is slow and cannot be bought.

Everything above is a reason this channel is defensible. What cannot be bought by you also cannot be bought by your competitor.

The work

Six workstreams, and two of them are yours.

A linkedin content strategy is mostly a supply chain problem. The writing is the visible part and the least likely thing to fail.

  1. 01

    Week 1

    Decide whose account this is

    Almost always the founder or a named operator, not the brand. A linkedin company page is useful for credibility and hopeless for reach, so it becomes a supporting asset rather than the channel. If the person who should post refuses to, that is the finding, and it is better in week one.

    Account audit1 viable
    Founder · posts occasionallyrun
    Head of product · willinglater
    Company pagesupport
    Anonymous brand voiceno

    Reach follows people. The page exists so the people look legitimate.

  2. 02

    Weeks 1–2

    Mine what you already know

    A long recorded conversation to extract the opinions, arguments and stories already in your head, then a standing weekly capture that takes twenty minutes. This is the founder-led content supply chain, and it is the part that quietly fails when nobody designs it.

    Idea bankfrom one session
    Opinions you will defend14
    Stories with a real outcome9
    Things you got wrong6
    Generic industry takesdiscarded

    One 90-minute conversation usually yields six to eight weeks of material.

  3. 03

    Ongoing

    Write it as you, then prove it

    Drafts built from your recordings, in your sentence length and your vocabulary, with the specifics left in rather than sanded off. The test before anything is sent to you is whether a competitor could have posted it. If they could, it gets rewritten.

    Draft testsbefore you see it
    Could a competitor post this?must be no
    Is there a real number or name?must be yes
    Does it admit anything?usually yes
    Opens with a generic hookrejected

    Nothing reaches you that has already failed one of these.

  4. 04

    Ongoing

    Show up in the comments

    Yours to do, twenty minutes a day at most, and the highest-return part of the whole channel. Social selling on this platform is mostly replying properly to people who engaged with something you wrote, rather than sending connection requests to strangers.

    Where the conversations startyour 20 min
    Replies on your own postshighest
    Comments on customers' postshigh
    Comments on prospects' postsmedium
    Cold connection requestslowest

    We prepare the list. The replying is genuinely not delegable.

  5. 05

    Month 2+

    Bring the rest of the company in

    Once the founder account works, the same supply chain extends to two or three colleagues who genuinely want to post. Employee advocacy fails when it is a rota and works when it is voluntary, so the number of participants is always smaller than the org chart suggests.

    Second wavevolunteers only
    Engineer who already writesin
    Head of support, keenin
    Sales team, mandatedskip
    Anyone assigned a quotaskip

    A mandated posting rota produces exactly the content people scroll past.

  6. 06

    Month 2+

    Read it honestly, including the flat weeks

    Reach on this platform swings wildly and a single post proves nothing. What we watch is the trend in profile views from your target accounts, inbound conversations, and whether the comment quality is improving. Followers are reported last and treated as the least interesting line.

    Monthly readleading · business

    Leading

    Profile views from target accounts, comment quality

    Business

    Inbound conversations, sourced meetings

    Note the flat weeks. Any chart of this channel without them is smoothed.

The same extraction session feeds articles, the newsletter and the answers that get cited. If community is also part of your picture, Reddit has a page of its own.

The alternatives

Four ways to do this. One of them tells you the time cost.

Standard linkedin ghostwriting removes the writing and quietly assumes you will supply everything else. Doing it yourself works until the third busy week. Paid reaches people who have never heard of you and will not remember.

busyless
LinkedIn content agency
Doing it yourself
LinkedIn ads
What the founder supplies
About 90 minutes a week, and the page says so before you enquire
Often advertised as nothing, which is how the posts end up generic
Everything, which is why it stops after a month
Nothing, and it shows
Where the ideas come from
Recorded conversations with you, plus a weekly capture
A monthly call, then a content calendar
Whatever occurs to you that morning
Trending topics
Who replies to comments
You. We prepare the list and will not do this bit for you
Sometimes the agency, under your name
You, when you remember
Nobody
The engagement-pod question
Never. It inflates numbers that do not convert and risks the account
Frequently, and rarely disclosed
Not applicable
Sometimes sold as a feature
Fit with everything else
One system, so a post becomes an article, a newsletter and a citation
One channel, reported on its own terms
Disconnected
Disconnected
Cost shape
$2,500 diagnosis, then from $5,000/mo across the whole system
$2,000 to $6,000/mo for this channel alone
Free, plus the opportunity cost of your evenings
Ad spend plus management

A specialist agency doing linkedin personal branding and nothing else is a fair choice if this is your only channel. It becomes expensive when the same material should have been feeding your articles and your newsletter at the same time.

Engagement

Find out whether the founder will actually do it.

The diagnosis answers one question above all others: is there a person here willing to have opinions in public every week? Everything else is solvable.

Start here

Discovery

$2,500one-off · two weeks

The account audit, a recorded extraction session that produces six to eight weeks of material, the analysis of what your market is already discussing, and a ninety-day plan. Yours to keep and executable by anybody.

  • Which account this runs from, and an honest read on whether it will
  • A 90-minute extraction session, transcribed and mined
  • What your buyers and competitors are already posting about
  • A ninety-day plan with the first fortnight drafted
Book the diagnosis

Most common

Ownership

From $5,000per month

The weekly capture, the drafting, the comment preparation and the reporting, run alongside the rest of the content system so one recorded conversation becomes posts, an article and a newsletter rather than posts alone.

  • Weekly capture that takes twenty minutes of your time
  • Drafts that fail the competitor test before you ever see them
  • A prepared comment list, which you answer yourself
  • Reporting on target-account reach, with followers reported last
Talk it through

One extraction session should feed more than one channel. The whole-system version is where that repurposing actually happens.

Let's build

One call. Real plan, not a pitch.

30 minutes. We talk about what's already working, who owns content today, and whether a fractional Head of Content is actually the right move. If it isn't, I'll say so.

Direct calendar

Book a 30-min intro call

Loading scheduler…

Calendar busy?

Send a note instead.

One sentence on the bottleneck. I'll reply within 24h with a sharper next step.

Or send a note

FAQ

Questions, ahead of time.

  • How much of my own time does LinkedIn actually take?+
    About ninety minutes a week once it is running: half an hour deciding what you think, twenty minutes recording it, twenty approving drafts and twenty in the comments. The first fortnight is heavier because of the extraction session. Anyone quoting you meaningfully less is either counting only the writing or planning to post things you have not read.
  • Should we post from the company page or a personal profile?+
    Personal, with the company page as a credibility backdrop rather than a channel. Reach on this platform follows people, and a brand account arguing a position reads as marketing while the same words from a named person read as an opinion. The page still matters because prospects check it, so it gets kept current and is not where the effort goes.
  • Is ghostwriting dishonest if the posts go out under my name?+
    Not if the thinking is yours and you read every word before it publishes, which is the arrangement here. Executives have had speechwriters for a century on exactly that basis. It becomes dishonest when the provider invents opinions you never held or replies to comments as you, and both of those are refused here rather than priced.
  • What if I am not comfortable being that personal in public?+
    Then we work within that, and the honest consequence is a smaller ceiling. Specific and candid outperforms polished and safe on this platform by a wide margin, so a founder unwilling to be occasionally wrong in public will get a competent, modest result. That is a legitimate choice and it is better made deliberately than discovered in month four.
  • How long before LinkedIn produces conversations?+
    Profile views from the right accounts move within a month, because that is a reach effect. Inbound conversations typically start in month two or three, and they arrive as somebody messaging you rather than filling in a form. If nothing has changed in the comments by week eight, the material is too safe and that is the thing to fix.
  • Do you use engagement pods or comment groups?+
    No. They produce numbers that look like performance and convert at close to zero, because the engagement comes from people outside your market doing you a favour. They also carry genuine account risk. If a provider will not answer this question directly, that is the answer.
  • Can this work for a B2B company with a tiny audience?+
    Usually better than for a large one. If two hundred people in your market read a post and four of them are buying this quarter, that beats twenty thousand impressions from outside your category. The measure that matters here is who is reading, which is why target-account profile views is the leading indicator rather than followers.
  • What does this cost, and can we buy just LinkedIn?+
    A two-week Discovery is $2,500 and covers the account audit, the extraction session and a ninety-day plan you keep. Ongoing ownership starts at $5,000 a month across the whole content system rather than this channel alone, because a post that never becomes an article or a newsletter is worth a fraction of what it could be.