Skip to content
busyless
Book a call
B2B search

A B2B SEO agency reports traffic. Your buyer is six people.

Six of them have to agree, four will never fill in a form, and the keyword that decides the deal gets ninety searches a month. Almost everything that makes search work in B2C misfires here.

So the work starts from the committee and the sales calls, and the traffic chart is the least interesting page in the report.

Book a 30-min callSee the six workstreams
Who has to agree2 of 6 covered
VP who signs“is this worth the budget”page
Manager who owns it“X vs Y for teams like us”page
The person who uses it“does it do [specific thing]”none
Security review“SOC 2, data residency”none
Finance“pricing, contract terms”none
The internal sceptic“X alternatives, X complaints”none

Illustrative. Four of these people never fill in a form, and the last one decides more than the first.

The inversion

In B2B, the value of a keyword runs opposite to its volume.

This is the single fact that makes B2B search a different discipline, and the one most reporting is built to hide.

A term with eighteen thousand searches a month brings students, competitors and job applicants. A term with ninety brings a committee halfway through an evaluation with budget already approved. One of those looks better in a monthly report and the other pays for the programme.

“what is [category]”

18,100/mo

Students, competitors, the curious

Vanity

“[competitor] vs [competitor] for regulated teams”

90/mo

A committee, mid-evaluation

Deals

Illustrative volumes. The ratio is the point, and in most B2B categories it is steeper than this.

The journey

Six stages, and you are absent for the one that decides it.

Most b2b seo services build for the middle three stages, because those are the ones a keyword tool can see. The first and the last two are where deals are actually won and lost.

  1. Stage 01

    Unaware

    They are not searching for you at all. Something else has to reach them.

    Founder-led social, original research

  2. Stage 02

    Problem-aware

    Searching the symptom in their own words, not your category name.

    Problem-framed articles

  3. Stage 03

    Solution-aware

    Now aware a category exists, working out which shape of tool fits.

    Approach comparisons

  4. Stage 04

    Vendor comparison

    You against two named competitors, plus whatever Reddit says about you.

    Comparison and alternatives pages

  5. Stage 05

    Internal sell

    The champion has to convince five colleagues in a meeting you are not in.

    A forwardable business case

  6. Stage 06

    Procurement

    Security, legal and finance search for reasons to say no.

    Trust pages, docs, pricing

Stage five is the one nobody builds for. Your champion is arguing your case in a meeting you were not invited to, using whatever you gave them.

Read this before you sign anything

What a B2B SEO agency cannot promise you.

Long cycles and committee buying make this the easiest category in search to report well and the hardest to actually move. Any B2B SEO agency can show you a rising traffic line inside a quarter. Four things make the line and the revenue come apart, and they are worth agreeing on before a contract rather than during a QBR.

  1. 01

    Traffic will probably go down before revenue goes up.

    Fixing a B2B site usually means deprioritising the high-volume informational terms that were never going to buy anything. Sessions fall, the chart looks bad for a quarter, and the pipeline contribution improves. If your board reads sessions, agree that in advance or this becomes a political problem rather than a marketing one.

  2. 02

    Nobody can attribute this cleanly, and the honest ones say so.

    Six people research separately over nine months, four of them never fill in a form, and the deal enters the CRM as an inbound demo request from one of them. Last-touch attribution will credit whichever page they landed on last. Anything presented as a precise revenue figure from organic is a modelling assumption wearing a number.

  3. 03

    The cycle is longer than the contract you are about to sign.

    If your sales cycle is nine months, content published in month two cannot show revenue in month six, no matter how good it is. Judging the programme on closed revenue inside two quarters means judging it before the evidence exists. Leading indicators are what you have until then.

  4. 04

    Some categories genuinely do not have the search demand.

    Brand-new categories, and markets of a few hundred named accounts, often have almost nothing worth ranking for. Search is then a small supporting channel rather than the engine, and pretending otherwise wastes a year. That answer comes out of the diagnosis, and I would rather give it in week two.

None of this makes search a bad channel for B2B. It makes the first three months a matter of leading indicators and agreed expectations rather than a revenue chart.

The work

Six workstreams, and two of them start in your call recordings.

A b2b seo strategy built from a keyword export will find the same terms your competitors found. The differentiated material is in your sales calls, your lost deals and the objections nobody has written a page about.

  1. 01

    Weeks 1–2

    Map the committee, not the persona

    Find out who actually has to agree, from sales calls and lost-deal notes rather than a marketing workshop. The economic buyer, the user, the sceptic, security, finance. Each searches differently and most of them will never identify themselves to you.

    Committee coverage2 of 6
    Economic buyercovered
    Day-to-day usercovered
    Security reviewno page
    The internal scepticno page

    Built from real lost-deal notes, not from a persona document.

  2. 02

    Weeks 2–3

    Rank keywords by deal, not by volume

    B2B keyword research that scores search intent and proximity to a purchase above traffic. A ninety-a-month comparison term from a buyer mid-evaluation is worth more than an eighteen-thousand-a-month definition, and the model has to say so out loud or the volume column will win every argument.

    Priority modeldeal-weighted
    Comparison and alternativestier 1
    Use case, by industrytier 1
    Pricing and procurementtier 2
    Category definitionstier 4

    Volume is a tiebreaker here, not the sort order.

  3. 03

    Weeks 3–10

    Write the pages sales already needs

    Start at the bottom of the funnel, because those pages pay back fastest and your sales team will tell you exactly which ones are missing. Comparison pages, objection pages, the industry-specific proof your champion needs. This is where b2b content marketing stops being a blog and starts being an asset the revenue team uses.

    Sales-requested pagesfrom call notes
    You vs the incumbentshipped
    Migration and switching costshipped
    Security and data residencydrafting
    ROI case for a CFOqueued

    Every one of these came out of a recording, not a keyword tool.

  4. 04

    Ongoing

    Arm the champion for a meeting you miss

    The most valuable asset in a B2B deal is something your champion can forward to five colleagues without editing it. That is a different artefact from a blog post: shorter, more specific, and written to survive being read by a sceptical finance director with no context.

    Forwardable assetsthe quiet win
    One-page business casehigh use
    Security summaryhigh use
    Implementation timelinemedium
    Long blog postnever forwarded

    Ask your AEs which link they paste most. That is the page to build next.

  5. 05

    Ongoing

    Cover the surfaces search does not own

    B2B buyers check review sites, communities and now AI assistants before they check your website. A page that ranks and an answer engine that omits you leaves the same gap, so the comparison research has to cover both and the off-site surfaces get worked deliberately.

    Where they actually check4 surfaces
    Google, page oneowned
    AI assistant answerspartial
    Review categoriesgap
    Community threadsgap

    A buyer who trusts none of your own pages will trust all four of these.

  6. 06

    Month 2+

    Report contribution, not sessions

    Leading indicators while the cycle plays out, business indicators once it does. Which target accounts read what, how many deals touched content before the demo, and how the sales team rates the assets. All of it stated as contribution, because the clean revenue number does not exist.

    Monthly readleading · business

    Leading

    Target accounts engaged, page-one coverage

    Business

    Content-touched pipeline, demo requests

    Shape of a report, not a forecast. Sessions are on it, low down, uncelebrated.

If the blocker is not knowing what to do but getting it shipped past legal, brand and a release train, that is a different problem with its own page.

The alternatives

Four ways to buy this. They optimise for different things.

A B2B SEO company will bring a team and a process. A b2b seo consultant will bring the plan and leave you the execution. A tool will bring a keyword list. The question is which of them is measured on the same thing you are.

busyless
B2B SEO agency
An SEO tool
Freelance writers
What gets optimised for
Proximity to a deal, then volume as a tiebreaker
Traffic growth, because it reports well
Whatever the tool ranks highest
Whatever the freelancer was briefed on
Where the topics come from
Sales calls, lost-deal notes and the questions procurement asks
A keyword tool export
A keyword tool export
You, in a brief
The committee
All six mapped, including the ones who never convert
One persona, usually the champion
Not modelled
Not modelled
What gets reported
Contribution, stated as leading and business indicators, with the gaps named
Sessions, rankings and a revenue figure with confident decimals
Rankings
Words delivered
Relationship with sales
Continuous. They request pages and rate them
Quarterly, if there is a meeting
None
None
Cost shape
$2,500 diagnosis, then from $5,000/mo to own it
$5,000 to $20,000/mo, often annual
Tool cost plus your time
Per article

If you have a capable in-house team and only need the direction and the quality bar, buying leadership without production is the cheaper and better arrangement, and it is why the two are priced apart here.

Engagement

Map the committee first. Everything else follows from it.

Two weeks of listening to sales calls and reading lost-deal notes changes the keyword list more than any tool will. So the first engagement is a diagnosis, and it is deliberately small.

Start here

Discovery

$2,500one-off · two weeks

The buying committee mapped from real evidence, a deal-weighted keyword model, the pages your sales team is already asking for, and a prioritised ninety-day plan. Yours to keep and specific enough for another provider to run.

  • Committee map built from sales calls and lost-deal notes
  • Keyword model scored on proximity to a deal, not volume
  • The comparison and objection pages that are missing today
  • A ninety-day plan, sequenced by what sales needs first
Book the diagnosis

Most common

Ownership

From $5,000per month

The whole system owned end to end: prioritisation, the editorial standard, the pages sales asks for, the off-site surfaces, and a monthly read that states contribution honestly rather than inventing a revenue figure.

  • Comparison, alternatives and objection pages, continuously
  • Forwardable assets for the meeting you are not in
  • AI answers and review surfaces covered alongside search
  • Reporting split into leading and business indicators
Talk it through

B2B buyers check communities and assistants before they check you. Both have their own pages: AI answers and Reddit.

Let's build

One call. Real plan, not a pitch.

30 minutes. We talk about what's already working, who owns content today, and whether a fractional Head of Content is actually the right move. If it isn't, I'll say so.

Direct calendar

Book a 30-min intro call

Loading scheduler…

Calendar busy?

Send a note instead.

One sentence on the bottleneck. I'll reply within 24h with a sharper next step.

Or send a note

FAQ

Questions, ahead of time.

  • Why would our organic traffic fall if this is working?+
    Because most B2B sites have accumulated high-volume informational pages that attract students, job seekers and competitors. Deprioritising them costs sessions and costs nothing else. What replaces them are lower-volume pages that a buying committee actually reads. If sessions are the number your board watches, the time to renegotiate that is before the work starts.
  • How do you pick keywords when the good ones have no volume?+
    By scoring how close a query sits to a purchase decision and how well you can answer it, then using volume only to break ties. In practice the tier-one list is comparison terms, alternatives, use cases by industry and procurement questions, most of which report double-digit monthly volume and convert at rates the definitional terms never approach.
  • Does any of this change for a SaaS product specifically?+
    The mechanics are the same and the emphasis shifts. B2B SaaS SEO usually leans harder on comparison and alternatives pages, free tools and documentation that ranks, because the category is crowded and the buyer self-serves further before talking to anyone. Services and industrial B2B lean more on proof, credentials and industry-specific evidence. The committee logic is identical.
  • How is this different from your enterprise SEO page?+
    This page is about who buys: a committee of six, long cycles, and keywords whose value runs inverse to their volume. The enterprise page is about what it takes to get a change shipped when nine templates, a legal review and a release train sit between the recommendation and production. A forty-person B2B company is the first without being the second. A large consumer retailer is the second without being the first.
  • Our sales cycle is nine months. When do we judge this?+
    Month three for leading indicators, meaning page-one coverage on the terms that matter, target accounts engaging, and whether sales are using the assets. Month nine at the earliest for anything resembling closed revenue, and even then as contribution rather than attribution. Agreeing that timeline up front is the single best predictor of whether the programme survives long enough to work.
  • Can you generate leads directly from this?+
    Content contributes to b2b lead generation rather than producing it in isolation, and I would not claim otherwise. What it reliably does is get you into the consideration set before anyone speaks to you, answer the objections that stall deals, and give your champion something to forward. Demo requests follow from that, several steps removed.
  • What does B2B search work cost here?+
    A two-week Discovery is $2,500 and produces the committee map, the deal-weighted keyword model and a prioritised plan you keep whether or not we carry on. Ongoing ownership starts at $5,000 a month for the judgement, with production capacity priced separately if you need the volume rather than the direction.
  • Do we need a big team for this to work?+
    No, and that is rather the point of buying leadership separately from production. If you already have writers, you can buy the strategy, the prioritisation and the quality bar and keep making the content yourself. If you have nobody, execution capacity is added on top. What does not work is buying volume without anybody owning the direction it goes in.