Ahrefs vs Semrush
Ahrefs
Best backlink data
The link index practitioners check against, with the API and six months of history on its cheapest plan, and use rationed instead.
$108 / mo
Lite, billed $1,290 a year
Semrush
Best for competitor research
The wider suite, with daily rank tracking on every plan. Extras are gated by tier, from MCP on Starter to the API on Advanced.
$117.33 / mo
SEO plan, annual billing
Ahrefs if link work is the job, Semrush if daily rankings and a wider suite are. That familiar answer held up in the r/bigseo threads I read for this page, with some dissent on keywords. What it leaves out is how differently the two charge, and that decides the real bill more often than the data does.
Ahrefs puts the API, the MCP server and six months of history on Lite at $108 a month billed annually. Then it rations use. Rankings refresh weekly, Lite holds three people with 1,000 credits each, and every tier raises the price of an extra seat.
Semrush charges $117.33 for its SEO plan and refreshes 500 rankings daily. What it rations is features. AI tracking and MCP start on Starter at $165.17, historical data on Pro+ at $248.17, and the API only on Advanced at $455.67.
So count two things before anything else: how many people need a login, and how often rankings must refresh. At three people and weekly tracking, Ahrefs is cheaper. At four people, or with a daily refresh, the arithmetic turns towards Semrush.
- 01Ahrefs refreshes tracked rankings weekly on all four plans; Semrush tracks daily from its $117.33 entry plan.
- 02Ahrefs Lite holds three people at most, so a four-person team starts on Standard at $388 a month with seats.
- 03Ahrefs includes API and MCP access from Lite at $108 a month; Semrush sells API access only on Advanced at $455.67.
- 04Ahrefs' pricing page and its own help centre give Lite different API allowances, 200,000 units against 100,000.
- 05The two pricing pages open on different billing periods, so their headline prices compare monthly against annual.
Ahrefs vs Semrush is the most crowded comparison in this category, and several pages answering it have a stake in the result. Ahrefs publishes its own comparison page, and Backlinko's version carries a note that Backlinko is owned by Semrush. I have tried to compare the part those pages skip, which is what each vendor counts before it sends you an invoice.
The short version is that they meter opposite things. Ahrefs opens most of its product on the cheapest plan, then limits how often, how much and how many people. Semrush is generous with use on every plan, then limits which features you can reach until you move up a tier.
Neither model is better in the abstract. A three-person link team and a six-person agency sending daily alerts get opposite answers from the same two price lists. Both answers are right for them.
Every price here is the US price in dollars, read from each vendor's own pricing page through a US connection on 17 September 2026. Ahrefs was read in both billing views, because its page opens on monthly prices while Semrush's opens on annual ones.
Where a figure comes from a help centre or developer docs instead, the page says so. Where two of a vendor's own pages disagree, it says that too, and names the one the arithmetic uses.
Ahrefs vs Semrush, side by side
Every value in the first block comes from the same record that drives the directory listing, so this table cannot disagree with the cards. Accented tags are capabilities one side has and the other does not.
The same workload, priced both ways
Six workloads, each priced at the plan that can actually carry it, on annual billing unless the row says otherwise. The entry prices are not what decide this pairing. What decides it is where a refresh rate, a seat cap or a feature gate pushes you up a tier.
US prices in USD, read on 17 September 2026 from ahrefs.com/pricing in both billing views and from semrush.com/pricing/. Annual per-month figures are the ones each page displays; Ahrefs rounds $1,290 a year to $108. Semrush lists extra seats from $45 and prices them by plan level, so its seat rows are floors. Neither page prices Ahrefs' faster ranking refresh or Semrush's API units.
These are the prices a US buyer sees. Both vendors choose the currency from the visitor, and the same day Ahrefs showed Lite in a different currency to a connection outside the US. Nothing here is converted, because a converted figure is a price neither vendor charges. A buyer outside the US should read both pages from where they are, and expect a different gap between them.
Where the pricing page and the invoice come apart
Not a list of limitations, which every comparison already carries. These are the five places where the published price is not the price you end up paying.
- Both
The two pricing pages open on different billing periods
Ahrefs' page loads on monthly billing and shows Lite at $129. Semrush's loads on annual billing and shows its SEO plan at $117.33. Side by side, Semrush looks cheaper. Like for like it is not: $139 against $129 a month, or $1,407.96 against $1,290 a year. Set both toggles to the same position before you compare a single row.
- Ahrefs
Ahrefs refreshes tracked rankings once a week
The pricing page lists weekly as the update frequency on all four plans, Enterprise included, and the help centre calls it the default. No faster refresh is priced anywhere on the page. If a client report or an alert depends on daily positions, ask Ahrefs what daily costs on your plan before you sign. Semrush includes it at $117.33.
- Ahrefs
A Lite seat is priced by how much the person uses it
On Lite, an extra person costs $20 a month once they spend more than five credits, per Ahrefs' help centre. Past 100 credits the charge becomes $40, with a ceiling of 1,000 credits. Charges apply to activity in the month even if you remove the user before it ends. A colleague who opens a few reports is a line item, so set per-user limits before you invite anyone.
- Ahrefs
Ahrefs' own pages disagree on the API allowance
The pricing page gives Lite 200,000 API units a month and Advanced 2 million. The help centre article on API v3, updated within the last month, still says 100,000 and 1 million. Ahrefs' March 2026 pricing guide says 25,000 integration units and 10 rows a request. I have used the pricing page. Check Limits and usage in your own account before you size a pipeline.
- Semrush
Semrush's entry plan crosses out the features it leads with
The pricing page is titled for SEO and AI search. Its $117.33 SEO plan shows crosses beside AI search tracking, AI sentiment, AI visibility reports and custom prompts, and lists no MCP access. All of those start on Starter at $165.17, and historical SEO data starts on Pro+ at $248.17. If any of them is why you are buying, the entry price is not your price.
Weekly positions against daily positions
Feature tables tend to give both vendors a tick for rank tracking, which hides the difference I would check first. Ahrefs refreshes tracked keywords weekly on every plan, according to its pricing table and its own Rank Tracker page. Semrush's entry plan tracks 500 keywords daily.
Ahrefs answers with volume. Lite tracks 750 keywords to Semrush's 500, and Standard tracks 2,000 to Pro+'s 1,500. Ahrefs counts one keyword in one location in one project as one tracked keyword, so a term followed in three cities uses three.
Whether weekly is enough depends on who reads the number. For a monthly client report, a weekly point is plenty. For an alert on a revenue page after a core update, a week is a long time to find out.
Two things narrow the gap. Search Console already records daily average positions for your own site at no cost. Both vendors can pull it in, Ahrefs through GSC Insights and Semrush through its report integrations. The daily third-party refresh earns its keep on competitors, which Search Console cannot show you.
Who reads the ranking number, and how soon do they need to know it moved? If it is a client at month end, weekly is fine. If it is you, the morning after an update, price daily before anything else.
How many people each plan will hold
Ahrefs caps extra users per plan: two on Lite, five on Standard and ten on Advanced. So Lite holds three people, Standard six and Advanced eleven, and only Enterprise is uncapped. Semrush's pricing page shows no cap, sells extra users from $45 a month, and sets the exact price by plan level.
The cap turns team size into a tier decision. Three people on Ahrefs Lite cost $108 plus two seats at $40, which is $188 a month. On Semrush's SEO plan the same three cost at least $207.33, so Ahrefs is cheaper.
Add a fourth person and Ahrefs has to move to Standard: $208 plus three seats at $60 is $388. Semrush stays on its SEO plan from $252.33. At seven people Ahrefs needs Advanced, and $374 plus six seats at $80 is $854, against at least $387.33 on Semrush.
Ahrefs also raises the seat price on each tier, from $40 to $60 to $80 to $100. An upgrade taken for data therefore reprices every login you already have. That is the mechanism to model before a hire, not after one.
The fair counterweight is what the higher plan buys. Ahrefs Standard removes the per-user credit cap, and carries more than twice Lite's tracked keywords and four times its history. A team pushed up by the seat cap is not paying for nothing. It is paying for things it may not have asked for.
On Ahrefs the number of people who need access can choose your plan for you. Write down the headcount for the next twelve months, not for today, before you pick a tier on either site.
Monthly credits on one side, daily search caps on the other
Ahrefs Lite gives each person 1,000 credits a month. Ahrefs' help centre says a credit is spent whenever you open a report, apply a filter or ask for more data. An afternoon of competitor research uses them quickly. Standard and above remove the cap for every active user, subject to fair use.
Semrush meters by the day instead. Its pricing FAQ gives SEO plan users 3,000 searches a day in the analytics reports, Pro+ 5,000 and Advanced 10,000. A search and a credit are not the same unit, so the numbers do not convert. The scale is still different: one allowance lasts a month, the other resets every day.
Ahrefs lets you run past its limits if you choose to. Pay-as-you-go is switched off by default. Switched on, extra Lite credits cost $50 per 500, and extra credits, crawl credits and API units all last three billing months. Semrush's API units work the other way and expire when the plan renews.
If more than one person will do research most days, I would price Ahrefs Standard from the start rather than Lite. The credit cap is the limit a research-heavy person meets first, and the seat charges on Lite grow with exactly that activity.
What a script can pull from each, and from which plan
Ahrefs puts API v3 on Lite and above, and its direct API, MCP server and Ahrefs Connect all draw on one monthly allowance. A request costs 50 units or the per-row field cost times the rows returned, whichever is higher. Cached responses cost nothing.
The limit that binds below Enterprise is rows per request: 100 on Lite, 250 on Standard and 500 on Advanced. A 20,000-row backlink export is 200 calls on Lite and 40 on Advanced, at a default ceiling of 60 requests a minute.
Semrush lists API data integration only on Advanced, and its units are sold in packages with no public price. MCP access starts lower, on Starter at $165.17, which makes an AI assistant the cheaper way into Semrush data than a script.
So the practical split is simple. On Ahrefs, a small team can script against the link index for $108 a month. On Semrush, a script is a $455.67 decision followed by a sales conversation.
Ahrefs offers free test queries and reports the real cost of every call in the response headers. Run your intended requests free first, then size the plan from those headers rather than from any pricing page.
Links, keywords and what the entry plan lets you see
The shorthand that keeps coming up in r/bigseo is links on one side and keywords on the other. Practitioners there call Semrush's keyword tooling and clustering genuinely strong, and tolerate a gap in its backlink data. When a link has to be confirmed, they turn to Ahrefs.
An Ahrefs vs Semrush comparison that stops at that shorthand hides a plan detail. Ahrefs Lite shows at most 2,500 rows per report, against 30,000 on Standard and 75,000 on Advanced, and exports 500,000 rows a month. On Lite, a profile with tens of thousands of backlinks is read through filters, a slice at a time.
Semrush's advantage runs the other way. It is the wider suite. It sells all-channel competitor traffic estimates as the Traffic & Market toolkit, at $289 a month billed annually, separately from the SEO plans. Ahrefs estimates organic and paid search traffic, not the other channels.
So the shorthand is a fair starting point with a price attached. If link work is the job, budget for the Ahrefs tier whose row limit fits your largest profile. If the job is market research, budget for the Semrush toolkit rather than assuming the SEO plan covers it.
Refund terms that run in opposite directions
Semrush offers a one-time, 7-day money-back guarantee, and only on a first subscription of twelve months or more, or a first add-on. Its policy states that month-to-month subscriptions are not refundable. A 7-day free trial comes first, and it converts to a paid plan automatically unless you cancel.
Ahrefs says it does not issue refunds in general. A monthly subscription may be refunded if you have not used the service, and Ahrefs may decline if it sees material activity. There is no trial, and its FAQ says it never runs discounts. The free way in is Ahrefs Free, on a site you can verify.
That makes the safe way to evaluate each one different. Use Semrush's trial first, and before buying annually, check that your purchase counts as the first one the guarantee covers. Ahrefs has no equivalent, so pay for one month of Lite, use it hard, and treat that month as spent.
Both let you cancel at any time, with the plan running to the end of the paid period. Ahrefs drops you to Ahrefs Free when it ends. Semrush requires its cancellation form, submitted while you are logged in, and says a request made any other way may be denied.
Pick each one when
Ahrefs
- Link work is the job, and you need rows from the index rather than a summary of it.
- You want API or MCP access and some history without paying for a top tier.
- Three people or fewer need a login and a weekly ranking refresh is enough.
Semrush
- Rankings have to refresh daily, and the list is around 500 keywords or fewer.
- Four or more people need access and you would rather add seats than change plan.
- Keyword clustering, content planning or all-channel traffic estimates are part of the work.
How this plays out once it is running
Most Semrush vs Ahrefs decisions I see are made on the data and then lived with on the invoice. Start the other way round. Write down the headcount for the next year, how often rankings must refresh, and whether anything has to leave the interface.
A three-person link team that reports monthly lands on Ahrefs Lite at $188 a month with two seats. It gets API access and six months of history, and it never notices the weekly refresh. That is Ahrefs' best case, and it is a common shape.
A six-person agency sending daily ranking alerts lands somewhere else. Ahrefs Standard holds six people for $508 a month and still refreshes weekly. Semrush's SEO plan with five extra seats starts at $342.33 and refreshes daily, but it tracks only 500 keywords across five websites.
That agency probably needs Semrush Pro+ at $248.17 before seats, and Semrush prices seats by plan level without itemising them. Get that quote in writing before you compare the two totals, because it is the one number that can reverse the result.
Ahrefs vs Semrush feels closest for a single buyer. At one seat, weekly tracking and no API, the entry plans sit within $10 a month of each other on either billing period. For that buyer the right answer really is whichever dataset matches your own domains better.
The counter-cases are the familiar ones, and they are real. If link work is the job, buy the plan that shows you most of the index, and treat cadence and seats as costs to manage. If one subscription has to cover daily rankings and market research, Semrush charges for tiers and toolkits. It rarely charges for how hard you use them.
What neither Ahrefs nor Semrush does
- Neither tells you which keywords deserve a page. Both return thousands sorted by volume, and the decision about the four worth writing is still yours. That decision moves more than any row in the table above.
- Neither measures traffic. Both model it from their own keyword data and click curves. In a January 2026 r/bigseo thread, one poster found them estimating the same domain at 709,000 and 1,800 monthly organic visits. Another suspected a keyword data bug behind the high figure.
- Neither replaces a dedicated crawler. An r/bigseo thread asked why the two produced markedly different site audits. The replies pointed to Screaming Frog or Sitebulb, and to knowing what you are looking at.
- Neither prints a price for the question you are most likely to ask. For Ahrefs it is a faster ranking refresh, and for Semrush it is API units. Both answers sit in an account screen or a sales conversation.
- Neither puts a full answer-engine index on its entry plan. Ahrefs sells its AI visibility index separately from $199 a month, and Semrush starts prompt tracking on Starter. Both sample answers that can change from one day to the next with nothing on your site changing.
Related comparisons
SE Ranking vs Semrush
One bundles programmatic access into its cheapest plan. The other sells it on a plan more than four times the price.
- SEO APIs
- Platform vs platform
Semrush vs Similarweb
One entry plan estimates what a competitor could earn from its rankings. The other models its visits across every channel, and Semrush sells that kind of number separately.
- SEO APIs
- Platform vs specialist
Sanity vs Contentful
One bills each editor by the month. The other is a flat $300 that stops at twenty users and three locales.
- Headless CMS
- Platform vs platform
FAQ
Frequently asked
Is Ahrefs cheaper than Semrush?
At the entry level, yes, once both are on the same billing period: $129 against $139 monthly, or $1,290 against $1,407.96 a year. The pages hide that by opening on different periods. Beyond one seat, Ahrefs pricing vs Semrush pricing turns on headcount. Ahrefs is cheaper for three people and dearer for four or more, because Lite stops at three.Does Ahrefs update tracked rankings every day?
Not by default. Ahrefs' pricing page lists a weekly update frequency on all four plans, and its help centre calls weekly the default. No faster refresh is priced on the page, so ask Ahrefs before you commit. Semrush's plans all track daily, starting with 500 keywords on its $117.33 SEO plan.How many users can an Ahrefs plan have?
Lite, Standard and Advanced each include one. Lite takes up to two more at $40 each, Standard up to five at $60, and Advanced up to ten at $80. Enterprise starts with three users and has no cap, with extra seats at $100. On Lite, an extra person is charged by activity, $20 or $40 a month depending on credits used.Which Ahrefs plans include the API and the MCP server?
Every plan from Lite at $108 a month on annual billing. The pricing page shows a tick for direct API access, the MCP server and Ahrefs Connect on all four plans. All three share one monthly allowance. Rows per request are capped at 100 on Lite, 250 on Standard, 500 on Advanced and uncapped on Enterprise.Why do Ahrefs' help centre and pricing page quote different API limits?
They have not been updated together. On 17 September 2026 the pricing page gave Lite 200,000 API units a month. The help centre's API v3 article said 100,000, and a March 2026 pricing guide said 25,000. This page uses the pricing page. Confirm the figure under Limits and usage in your account before you budget a pipeline.Does Semrush's cheapest plan track AI search?
No. The SEO plan at $117.33 shows crosses beside AI search tracking, AI sentiment, AI visibility reports and custom prompts. Starter at $165.17 adds 50 tracked prompts a day and 300 AI visibility reports a day, and Advanced reaches 200 prompts. Ahrefs includes five custom prompts on Lite and sells its wider AI index separately.What does an Ahrefs credit count?
Ahrefs' help centre says a credit is spent when you open a report, apply a filter or request more data. Site Audit and Rank Tracker do not use them. Lite includes 1,000 credits per user a month. Extra credits cost $50 per 500 if you switch on pay-as-you-go, and Standard and above have no credit cap.Does Semrush estimate competitor traffic that Ahrefs does not?
Yes, across channels. Semrush sells all-channel traffic estimates as its Traffic & Market toolkit, at $289 a month billed annually, separate from the SEO plans. Ahrefs estimates organic and paid search traffic only. Treat both as models rather than measurements, and check them against a site whose Search Console you can see.What are the refund terms at Ahrefs and at Semrush?
Semrush gives a one-time 7-day money-back guarantee on a first annual subscription or a first add-on, and no refunds on month-to-month plans. Ahrefs says it does not issue refunds in general, though an unused monthly subscription may qualify. Semrush also offers a 7-day free trial; Ahrefs offers no trial and says it never runs discounts.Should a solo consultant start on Ahrefs Lite or Semrush's SEO plan?
For one person, Ahrefs or Semrush comes down to two questions. If link work and API access matter, Ahrefs Lite at $108 includes both. If daily rankings matter, Semrush's SEO plan includes them. For AI search tracking at volume, compare Semrush Starter at $165.17 with Ahrefs' prompt packages from $50 a month. Test each on a domain you know well first.