Skip to content

How SimplyDepo went from 999 to 10,127 search clicks a quarter with articles its buyers actually read

A field sales platform for CPG brands and distributors. We wrote the articles, checked every claim against the product, and built the landing pages they link to.

  • 10×

    Search clicks per quarter, site-wide

  • #3

    Avg position, top article (1,581 clicks)

  • 31 → 12

    Average position across the site

Want articles your buyers trust enough to click through?

I'll look at what your blog ranks for today and tell you which articles are worth writing first.

Book a call
Working with Yevhen has been great. They think strategically about SEO, focus on what drives growth, and execute consistently. Clear communication, strong ownership, real results.
Ivan Khymych · CEO & Founder, SimplyDepo

Challenge

A strong product, ready to be found

SimplyDepo makes a mobile app for field sales teams. Their customers are CPG brands, wholesale distributors and merchandising teams in the US and Canada. A rep uses it to take orders in a store, plan a route, run a retail audit and sync with QuickBooks.

The product was already good. SimplyDepo has 4.7 stars on G2, 4.9 on Capterra and 21 published customer stories. The next step was helping more buyers find it through search.

In the three months before we started (August to October 2025), the whole site got 999 clicks from Google. The average position was 31.5, which is page four. Their buyers were searching, and there was plenty of room to meet them there.

A niche B2B audience makes this hard in a specific way:

  • The buyers know the job better than most writers do. A distributor running direct store delivery can tell in one paragraph if the writer has never seen a delivery route.
  • The topics are narrow. "Catch weight", "DSD software" and "retail execution monitoring" are not subjects a general content agency writes about well.
  • Generic writing risks the product's credibility. If an article says the routing is "AI-powered" and it isn't, the buyer finds out on the demo call.

The usual options didn't fit:

Option

Why it didn't work here

A general content agency

Fast and cheap, but writers who have never met a field rep. The articles read like it.

An in-house writer

One person can't cover route planning, EDI, inventory and CRM at the depth the buyers expect.

AI content at volume

Cheap per article, but it invents features and statistics. On a product site, that's a liability.

So we built something else: a writing process that starts from what SimplyDepo actually does, checks every claim against it, and publishes articles that sit in front of the buyer at the moment they're comparing tools.

Solution

What we built

We started in November 2025 with a plan of 54 topics. Each one had a keyword, a stage in the buying journey and a type:

  • Software listicles – "10 best CRMs for field sales", "top 7 DSD software", "best inventory system for small business"
  • Industry pieces – direct store delivery, online authorized retailers, retail audits, POP vs POS
  • How-to guides – route planning, inventory forecasting, sales territory plans
  • Comparisons – Repsly vs Pepperi, WizCommerce alternatives

Each article is written for one reader: someone at a CPG brand or distributor who is about to spend money on software. It answers their question first. SimplyDepo shows up where it genuinely fits, not in every paragraph.

Alongside the articles, we built 40 programmatic landing pages: 30 solution pages and 10 "alternative to" pages (Laceup, VIP, Encompass, bMobile, B2B Wave and others). Articles need somewhere useful to send a reader. These pages are that somewhere.

How it works

Every article goes through the same steps. None of them is optional.

The six steps every SimplyDepo article goes through, from search research to final QA
  1. Research the search results. What already ranks, what it covers, and what it gets wrong or leaves out.
  2. Check the product knowledge base. SimplyDepo's knowledge base is 152KB of verified facts: prices, features, integrations, limits and what's on the roadmap. It was last checked against the product in August 2026.
  3. Write to the article type. A listicle, a comparison and a how-to guide each have their own rules for structure and proof.
  4. Run five proofreading passes. Each pass looks for one kind of problem: wrong facts, weak claims, repeated phrasing, readability and house style.
  5. Finalise for search. Keywords placed once, where they read naturally. Internal links added.
  6. Final QA.

Each article has five links to other blog posts, two to landing pages and one clear call to action. Each one also cites at least one real SimplyDepo customer story, such as 88 Acres, Tenace, Brickyard Brands or HC Foods.

The part that made it work: honesty rules

This is what makes SimplyDepo's content different, and it came from reading the product closely.

The honesty rules on every SimplyDepo article: never and always

We wrote down what the product does not do, and enforced it on every article:

  • Route planning is never called "AI". SimplyDepo's routing follows rules. It's good at that, but calling it AI would be untrue, and a buyer would notice.
  • EDI and catch weight are described as roadmap, not features. Both are common buyer questions. The honest answer is "not yet", so that is what the articles say.
  • Every "cons" section names a real limitation. A listicle where SimplyDepo has no weaknesses reads like an ad. Buyers skip those.
  • No borrowed statistics. If a number came from a competitor's blog, we didn't use it. The later articles use sources like the US Bureau of Labor Statistics and published research instead.

We also ran the existing site through the same rules. Where an older page had drifted from the current product, we noted it for SimplyDepo's team, because a buyer who spots one wrong claim stops trusting the rest.

Keeping 50+ articles from sounding the same

Writing a lot of articles on one topic has a known risk: they start to repeat each other. Same openings, same phrases, same structure.

We measure this. For each batch, we compare every article against every other article and count shared eight-word phrases. On SimplyDepo's first batch in August 2026, the worst pair shared 9. On other projects, the same check has found anywhere from 85 to 450 in a batch.

That matters for readers, and it matters for Google, which is getting better at spotting sites that publish the same article many times with the nouns changed.

Linking it together

Articles that don't link to each other don't help each other rank. We built two internal linking sheets:

  • April 2026 – links between existing articles, and from articles to the solution pages
  • July 2026 – links to pages Google had found but not yet indexed, to give them a reason to crawl

The work, month by month

Period

What shipped

Nov 2025 – May 2026

Software listicles, industry pieces and comparisons, delivered monthly

Spring 2026

30 solution pages and 10 alternative pages

April and July 2026

Two rounds of internal linking

Aug – Sep 2026

Eight batches of research-led articles: territory planning, consultative selling, EDI, lean inventory, account management and more

What I delivered

  • A content plan with 54 topics, updated as results came in
  • Articles delivered to Google Docs each month, ready to publish
  • 40 landing pages, checked by a script before handover
  • A product knowledge base that every article is checked against
  • Internal linking plans, twice
  • A consistency check of product claims across the existing site

Impact

Ten times the search clicks

These numbers come from SimplyDepo's Google Search Console. They compare two windows of the same length, 92 days each.


Before (Aug – Oct 2025)

Now (Jun 20 – Sep 19, 2026)

Clicks

999

10,127

Impressions

668,144

3,606,970

Average position

31.5

12.0

That is 10× the clicks and an average position that moved from page four to page two.

SimplyDepo Google search clicks per month, Jun 2025 to Aug 2026, rising from 257 to 3,816

One honest caveat: these are site-wide numbers. SimplyDepo's own team kept publishing too, and some of the biggest pages on the site are not ours. The table below lists only the pages we can match to a busyless article:

Article

Clicks (92 days)

Avg position

Online authorized retailer

1,581

3.1

Best inventory system for small business

378

7.6

DSD software

67

11.5

Direct store delivery companies

46

9.0

Retail CRM

32

10.9

Outside sales rep software

29

10.3

Retail execution monitoring software

26

17.1

Sales mapping software

23

14.1

Best CRM for sales reps

22

7.8

The online authorized retailer article is now the second-biggest page on the whole site by clicks.

The software listicles bring fewer clicks, and that's expected. "Best CRM for sales reps" gets a few dozen clicks, but every one of them is someone shopping for exactly what SimplyDepo sells. Traffic volume and buyer value are different things.

What's still in progress

The August and September 2026 articles are too new to judge. Most are ranking on page one or two with impressions and few clicks yet. That is normal for articles a few weeks old. We'll know more by December.

What changed for the team

SimplyDepo gets finished articles each month that they don't have to fact-check against their own product, because that check already happened. And every new article tells one consistent story about what the product does and doesn't do.

Want the same for your blog? Book a call and I'll show you what we'd write first.

Results

  • Search clicks went from 999 to 10,127 a quarter, comparing the same 92-day windows
  • Average position across the site moved from 31.5 to 12.0
  • One article, on online authorized retailers, brought 1,581 clicks in 92 days at an average position of 3
  • Nine confirmed busyless articles now rank between positions 3 and 17
  • 40 programmatic landing pages shipped alongside, so articles had real pages to link to
  • Every product claim checked against the product before it went live

Built with

Reusable systems behind this build – same automations are available for your team.

Every automation behind these builds.

25 systems with tools, complexity, build time, and which case studies use each.