Automation for healthcare content teams without compromising compliance.
AI-assisted drafts with clinical review gates, HIPAA-aware workflows, regulatory-friendly content systems.
- 57+projects shipped
- 2.5M+organic traffic managed
- 14 dayskickoff to live system
- 01
Signal in
GSC / Notion / your data
- 02
Claude · think + draft
your tone, your facts
- 03
Publish
WordPress, Webflow, your CMS
Why healthcare teams need automation.
Healthcare content is where most 'content automation' pitches break down. The compliance reviews are non-negotiable. The clinical accuracy is non-negotiable. The data-handling rules are non-negotiable. Vendors saying 'we 10×'d this team's output' usually mean 'we removed the safety gates' — and that's a malpractice lawsuit waiting to happen.
Done right, automation in healthcare doesn't replace clinical review. It feeds clinical review faster, with cleaner drafts, against verified sources. The bottleneck doesn't move from 'we need more reviewers'; it moves to 'reviewers have less low-quality drafts to wade through.' That's the real win.
Compliance reviews kill velocity
A blog post takes 3 weeks because compliance has a 2-week queue. Most posts die in the queue. The team learns to ship less rather than fight the system.
Clinical accuracy isn't optional
One wrong dosage in a patient-facing blog and you're in a different industry. AI-generated drafts without source-grounding aren't acceptable risk.
Patient data can't go near third-party AI
HIPAA + GDPR + state laws + clinical ethics. Most off-the-shelf AI tools haven't passed those reviews. So your team can't use the tools that 10× output in other industries.
Marketing claims need legal sign-off
Every claim, every statistic, every implication — legal has to bless it. Without automation, that means humans copy-pasting claims into shared docs and waiting for emails.
5 ways we automate healthcare content.
AI automation for healthcare
Claude-powered workflows that do the thinking — content enrichment, optimization, competitive research, programmatic landing pages. Production-grade, not prototype.
Read moreContent automation for healthcare
Briefs to drafts to published posts — the editorial loop on rails. Notion, Airtable, Claude, and your CMS, all talking to each other so your team ships.
Read moreMarketing automation for healthcare
Campaign orchestration, lead routing, reporting digests — the marketing ops layer that connects your content engine to the funnel.
Read moreSEO automation for healthcare
Programmatic SEO, automated content briefs, internal linking, and content updates — built on n8n + Claude. The engine that compounds while you sleep.
Read moreSocial media automation for healthcare
Reddit monitoring, comment search, channel-native repurposing — turn one piece of content into ten posts without losing the voice or hitting spam filters.
Read more
Want this built for your team?
Book a call and walk through what we'd adapt for your stack.
What we use in healthcare.
n8n
Workflow orchestration
Claude
Reasoning + writing
Notion
Editorial backbone
Airtable
Structured data
WordPress
Publishing
Ahrefs
SEO intelligence
GSC
Search Console signal
GA4
Analytics signal
What healthcare teams get wrong.
Healthcare content automation doesn't mean 'skip the review'
It means clinical reviewers see cleaner drafts, with sources cited, against verified guidelines. Same review depth, half the prep work.
AI-generated drafts speed up review, not replace it
Reviewers spend their hour on judgment calls, not formatting fixes. The leverage is in moving the work upstream — better drafts to review, not skipped reviews.
Self-hosted models exist for a reason
Some workflows can't send data to Claude or OpenAI, period. Self-hosted Llama or Mistral handles those steps. Slower, dumber, but compliant. We build the systems that route per-data-class to the right model.
Four weeks from audit to handover.
$ busyless audit --stack
- Notion41 ACTIVE PAGES
- n8n3 WORKFLOWS · 1 STALE
- Slack12 CHANNELS MAPPED
3 automation opportunities ranked.
Step 01 · Week 1
Audit + mapping
Stack review. We map your content ops end-to-end and lock the one automation that pays back the fastest.
$ busyless build --system
- TriggerNOTION DB
- AgentCLAUDE · RAG
- ApprovalSLACK
- PublishWEBFLOW
Live on staging.
Step 02 · Week 2
Build
I ship the system on n8n + Claude + your CMS. You watch the Loom; we review checkpoints every 48h.
$ busyless test --quality
- researchPASS
- draftPASS
- publishPASS
0 errors. 12 edge cases caught.
Step 03 · Week 3
Test
Quality gate, edge cases, and a hand-off run with one of your editors. Anything off gets fixed inside the window.
$ busyless handover --doc
- Loom12 MIN WALKTHROUGH
- Runbook24 SECTIONS
- Credentials1PASSWORD
2 weeks support included.
Step 04 · Week 4
Handover
Workflow JSON + docs + a recorded walkthrough. You own the code; I'm one Slack away.
One operator beats the alternatives on every axis that matters.
No account managers, no junior hand-offs, no 9-month onboarding. The person scoping the build is the one shipping it.
Need something the table doesn't cover?
Custom scope, retainer, or a one-off prototype — say what you need on the call.
Pricing
Three ways in. All priced upfront.
Audit
$1,500one-offFind the bottleneck. Get a 30-day automation roadmap.
Start with an auditBuild
$2,250per automationOne custom automation, shipped in 14 days.
Scope a buildFractional
$7,650per monthContent marketing strategy + automation, monthly.
Book a strategy call
Map automation across your healthcare stack.
30 min. We walk your content ops, lock the bottleneck, and pick the one healthcare automation that pays back fastest. No qualification form.
Direct calendar
Book a 30-min intro call
No sales rep, no qualification form. You pick a slot, we talk.
Calendar busy?
Send a note instead.
One sentence on the bottleneck. I'll reply within 24h with a sharper next step.
Frequently asked
Can this be HIPAA compliant?
Yes — for workflows handling PHI, we route to self-hosted models (Llama, Mistral) deployed on your HIPAA-eligible infrastructure (AWS HIPAA, Azure HIPAA). For non-PHI marketing content, we use Claude or OpenAI's enterprise tiers with appropriate BAAs.What about clinical accuracy?
Every clinical-adjacent draft passes through a source-grounding step (the model is forced to cite published guidelines) AND a clinical review gate (a human clinician approves before publish). The system optimises for accuracy, then speed — not the reverse.Does this work for pharma marketing?
Yes — including MLR-friendly workflows. Drafts route through Medical, Legal, and Regulatory review with approvals tracked. Every claim cites a source from your approved-source library. Audit trails for every revision.